The Big Bang Theory - INDIVIDUAL

  • Due No Due Date
  • Points 30
  • Submitting a file upload
  • File Types doc, docx, pdf, and txt

canvas-banner.png

 

THE BIG BANG THEORY - INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT

In your own words (no more than 3000) explain the Big Bang Theory.  Some things you may want to focus on are:

  1. What are the main influencing factors?
  2. Estimated age of the universe?
  3. Rate of expansion...

You will be assessed in some key areas and these are highlighted in the rubric attached to the assessment.

Turn in date is highlighted in the calendar and should you have andy questions please post your message in the discussion forum.Please refer to this document before stating this assignment. It can be access by CLICKING HERE....

 

 
    0

    Rubric

    Find Rubric
    The Big Bang Theory Grading Criteria
    The Big Bang Theory Grading Criteria
    Criteria Ratings Pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Clear Perspective
    threshold: 4.0 pts
    4 pts
    Exceeds Standards: Develops detailed and convincing argument that establishes a clear, nuanced perspective. (Structurally for example: "I am for X because Y or with the condition Z.")
    3 pts
    Meets Standards: Develops a fairly convincing argument with sufficient information to establish a perspective but is not conditional or well thought out.ations
    2 pts
    Almost Meets Standards: Attempts to develop a convincing argument although details are lacking and perspective may be unclear.
    1 pts
    Not Yet: Does not seem to attempt to develop a convincing argument and details are lacking. Perspective is unclear.
    pts
    4 pts
    --
    Additional Comments
    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Engaging
    threshold: 4.0 pts
    4 pts
    Exceeds Standards: The writing effectively uses language, style and tone appropriate to the genre, medium and audience and engages the reader through things like attention getting introductions, word choice, images, personal stories (whatever the teacher would like to focus on).
    3 pts
    Meets Standards: Most of writing effectively uses language, style and tone appropriate to the genre, medium and audience and engages the reader through things like attention getting introductions, word choice, images, personal stories (whatever the teacher would like to focus on)
    2 pts
    Almost Meets Standards: While there are some sections or words that try to engage the reader, the language, style or tone need more work to engage the reader and are not appropriate to the genre, medium and audience.
    1 pts
    Not Yet: The language, style and tone of the work make little attempt to engage the reader.
    pts
    4 pts
    --
    Additional Comments
    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Evidence
    threshold: 4.0 pts
    4 pts
    Exceeds Standards: Opinions and reasoning are supported with strong, compelling evidence that is factual and philosophical and is from well established or reputiable sources that make the evidence credible.
    3 pts
    Meets Standards: Evidence supports reasoning and opinion and it may be factual (i.e., the mosque is two blocks away and it isn't a mosque) and philosophical (its about freedom).
    2 pts
    Almost Meets Standards: Some evidence may be present to support the resoning but other evidence is irrelevant. There may be a mismatch between reason and the types of evidence.
    1 pts
    Not Yet: Little evidence is present or evidence is based purely on feelings or is off topic--anecdotal reportage.
    pts
    4 pts
    --
    Additional Comments
    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Opposing Arguments
    threshold: 4.0 pts
    4 pts
    Exceeds Standards: Engages one or many targeted and relevant competing arguments by elaborating and picking apart the opponent's argument to bolster or defend the writer's own argument.
    3 pts
    Meets Standards: Engages one or many competing arguments by elaborating or picking apart the argument to bolster or defend the writer's own argument.
    2 pts
    Almost Meets Standards: Acknowledges a competing argument, but does not elaborate on it or pick it apart in any way. Ex: "My opponents say x, I say
    1 pts
    Not Yet: No attempt is made to acknowledge a competing argument
    pts
    4 pts
    --
    Additional Comments
    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Strong Reasons
    threshold: 4.0 pts
    4 pts
    Exceeds Standards: Provides strong, distinct reasons that support the writer’s opinion and develop the argument, e.g., the meaning is connected directly to the perspective and the reasons are clearly different from each other.) Feelings or personal peferences may be present but don’t stand alone.
    3 pts
    Meets Standards: Provides reasons that support the writer’s opinion and develop the argument--may not be thoroughly connected to the perspective or may be overlapping. Feelings or personal peferences may be present but don’t stand alone.
    2 pts
    Almost Meets Standards: Few reasons are evident; there needs to be more support and development of the writer’s argument--reasons are weakly connected to the perspective, largely overlap and/or rely solely on feelings and personal preferences.
    1 pts
    Not Yet: No or only a vague reasons are provided but there needs to be more support and development of the reader’s argument.
    pts
    4 pts
    --
    Additional Comments
    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Speaks clearly with appropriate pace and adjust according to audience
    threshold: 4.0 pts
    5 pts
    Excellent
    4 pts
    Very Good
    3 pts
    Good
    2 pts
    Bad
    1 pts
    Very Bad
    pts
    5 pts
    --
    Additional Comments
    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Collaborates effectively within group activities
    threshold: 4.0 pts
    5 pts
    Excellent
    4 pts
    Very Good
    3 pts
    Good
    2 pts
    Bad
    1 pts
    Very Bad
    pts
    5 pts
    --
    Additional Comments
    Total Points: 30 out of 30